Products Liability Defenses & Review
Products Liability Claims
- ?????????????????
- ?????????????????
- ?????????????????
Products Liability Claims
- Manufacturing Defects
- Design Defects
- Failure to Warn
Elements of a Claim
Negligence
- Duty
- Breach
- Causation
- Harm
[.column] Strict Liability
- Defendant was engaged in the kind of activity where strict liability applies
- Causation
- Harm
[.column] Products Liability
- Defect
- Causation
- Harm
Speller v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
“Refrigerator Fire”
—
Proving product defect without specific evidence
Incident that harmed the plaintiff:
- was of a kind that ordinarily occurs as a result of product defect
- was not solely the result of other causes
—
Jones v. Ryobi, Ltd.
“The Modified Printing Press”
Anderson v. Nissei ASB Machine Co.
“The Bottle-Making Machine that Amputated an Arm”
—
How can you defend against a strict liability or products liability claim?
—
How can you defend against a strict liability or products liability claim?
- Disprove elements of plaintiff’s claim
- Affirmative defenses
- Comparative negligence
- Assumption of risk
—
Comparative Responsibility is Hard
Can a plaintiff be negligent for failing to discover a defect?
Restatement (Second) of Torts
Contributory negligence of the plaintiff is not a defense when such negligence consists merely in a failure to discover the defect in the product, or to guard against the possibility of its existence.
Restatement Third
[W]hen the defendant claims that the plaintiff failed to discover a defect, there must be evidence that the plaintiff’s conduct in failing to discover a defect did, in fact, fail to meet a standard of reasonable care. In general, a plaintiff has no reason to expect that a new product contains a defect and would have little reason to be on guard to discover it.
—
Assumption of Risk
—
Assumption of Risk
Express (Disclaimers and waivers)
Implied (Knowingly encounter a danger)
—