Vicarious Liability
But first…
—
Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co.
“Fireworks on the Train Platform”
—
Majority opinion (Cardozo)
and
Dissenting opinion (Andrews)
“What we do mean by the word ‘proximate’ is, that because of convenience, of public policy, of a rough sense of justice, the law arbitrarily declines to trace a series of events beyond a certain point. This is not logic. It is practical politics.”
- Andrews dissent in Palsgraf
—
Vicarious Liability
—
Miller v. Reiman-Wuerth Co.
“The Bank Errand”
—
Christensen v. Swenson
“The Lunch Break”
—
Three criteria
- Employee’s conduct must be of the general kind the employee is hired to perform.
- Employee’s conduct must occur substantially within the hours and ordinary spatial boundaries of the employment.
- Employee’s conduct must be motivated, at least in part, by the purpose of serving the employer’s interest.
—
Kuehn v. Inter-city Freight
“Road Rage”
—
Sage Club v. Hunt
“The Violent Bartender”