Duty for Purely Emotional Harm Cont.
Assignment Report Back:
[fit]Did you do something kind and restorative for yourself?
Duties of Governmental Entities
Duty for Purely Emotional Harm
Falzone v. Busch
Policy Reasons for “Impact” Rule
- Flood of litigation
- Fake claims
- Problems of proof
“Zone of Danger”
Requires a reasonable fear of immediate physical injury
Two Lingering Questions
- How is emotional harm different than damages for pain and suffering?
- Why are we learning about this under the duty chapter?