Res Ipsa Loquitur 2
Byrne v. Boadle
McDougald v. Perry
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Two requirements:
- Harm results from the kind of situation in which negligence can be inferred
- Defendant was responsible for the instrument of harm
Differences Across Jurisdictions
Res ipsa loquitur can either be:
an inference (e.g., New York), or
a presumption (e.g., California).
Why Allow Res Ipsa Loquitur?
- Probabilistic rationale
- Asymmetry and fairness justification